Skip to content
Prompt & SolderHow to Ask Claude
All builds

Image: dev.to

Failed Horror story Proof shown

A sub-agent followed Windows junctions and deleted 48,000 files

After ten successful repair jobs, a Claude Code sub-agent followed 614 Windows directory junctions out of a test copy and deleted files from the real system.

—

Credits

  • Article author ramdai_bista Source ↗

Earliest dated source: 30 Oct 2026

What went wrong

The lesson

Links and junctions can lead a "safe" test copy straight back to real files. Give agents a sandbox with no links out, and don't let them run recursive deletes unattended.

The full story

A developer had run Claude Code through ten successful repair jobs on software for analysing historical stock-options data, always working on copies. The eleventh job was to rebuild a test copy of the project, and that copy contained 614 Windows directory junctions, folder shortcuts pointing back at the real, live files.

Cleaning up the copy, a sub-agent followed the junctions out into the real project. In just over 100 seconds it removed about 55,550 files, around 48,000 of which were never meant to go, and the project had never been pushed anywhere. Mid-task the agent told the developer: "stop and read this. I broke something." The account comes from a Reddit post, since deleted, relayed by TechRadar.

Tools

Themes

Loading themes…

Sources

From the maker's own write-up or code. We summarise what they report; we haven't tested it ourselves.

  • DEV: A Claude Code Sub-Agent Followed 614 Windows Junctions Out of a Test Mirror, Deleting 48,000 Live FiBlog or write-updev.to
    Article author: ramdai_bistaPublished 30 Oct 2026

    A write-up of the incident and what it doesn't establish.

Related builds

Finding related builds…

Prompt & Solder

An independent community project. Not affiliated with Anthropic.

What this is. Real projects where people used Claude to build, fix, port, revive or take apart something, from jailbroken Kindles to rebuilt DOS games, plus the times it went badly wrong. Every build links to where it was shared, and every source is listed here.

How far to trust it. We summarise what people reported and say what each build rests on: a full write-up with code, a short post, or a passing comment. We haven't tested them ourselves. Photos are shown from the original sources with credit. Only modify hardware you own, and back up first.

Privacy. No accounts. Analytics cookies (Google Analytics) only if you accept them; no ads or cross-site tracking. Searches are counted anonymously (just the words) to show what's popular, and so are clicks on Ask Claude (just the count).

How toEvery sourceStatsSubmit a buildRSS